Georgette Heyer Gems of August Event Winners

 Well ladies and gentlemen we have come to the end of “Georgette Heyer Gems of August”. It has been such a pleasure sharing the works of Georgette Heyer with you all. Thanks to everyone who contributed to this event and those who followed along. We have had some great discussions concerning Heyer and her work and I want to especially thank all those who commented this month and kept the chatter going. This was my first event of this kind here at Stiletto Storytime and I am so pleased that many of you have personally reached out to say how very much you enjoyed it. Again I cannot say enough about all those who contributed with guest reviews and guest posts- you were all so superb.

And now the moment you have all been waiting for…the two winners of the Sourcebooks Georgette Heyer Prize Packs! Each winner will receive a prize pack of four Georgette Heyer books courtesy of Sourcebooks. So without further ado those winners chosen from the comments on all Heyer posts this month by random number generator are…

Colleen Turner  who is the winner of the “Georgette’s Goodies Prize Pack” which includes: Black Sheep, Regency Buck, The Black Moth & Bath Tangle.

Marlene Breakfield who is the winner of the “Heyer’s Heist Prize Pack” which includes: The Convenient Marriage, Cousin Kate, False Colours & Lady of Quality.

Congratulations to both ladies and Happy Heyer Reading!

Guest Review: Black Sheep by Georgette Heyer (1966)

I was really excited to have the opportunity to participate in this Georgette Heyer event on Stiletto Storytime.  I had actually never read any Georgette Heyer before, and this gave me a great reason to do so.  I have to admit that I don’t really consider myself a romance reader, so at first I had avoided Heyer’s books.  But then I found out that they were actually romances in the same vein as Austen, not historical bodice rippers at all.  And I had multiple people whose reading tastes I share and trust, including Miss Stiletto Storytime herself, mention that they really loved her books, so I knew I really needed to give her a try.  I’m so glad I did.I loved my first Heyer experience!

To quickly summarize my selection, Black Sheep: Abigail Wendover is a 28-year-old “spinster” living in Bath who, along with her sister Selina is responsible for the care of their orphaned 17-year-old niece Fanny.  Abby returns from a visit with relatives in London and discovers that Fanny has developed a relationship with the handsome Stacy Calverleigh, a man Abby senses is only after Fanny’s fortune.  When Stacy’s uncle Miles, considered the black sheep of the family, arrives in Bath as well, Abby seeks his assistance in putting an end to the relationship and falls for Miles herself, despite her better sense telling her she should stay away from him.

Even though Black Sheep was filled with character types we’ve all seen before – the heroine who’s considered past her prime; the suitor with a dark past; the silly young girl carried away by her first crush; the dashing young man who may not have the best of intentions – Heyer managed to develop each of these types into fleshed out characters the reader cares about.  I thought that the plot was turning out to be somewhat predictable as well, but Heyer managed to surprise me with a nice twist or two in the end.  The best thing about Heyer’s writing by far is her way with words and her great sense of humor.  I found myself laughing out loud several times while reading this book.  The only negative thing I can say about the book is that I felt like it ended too abruptly.  I wanted the ending to be a little more developed, to find out a little more about the future of the characters I’d come to love.  I’m looking forward to reading more Heyer, and not just her historical romances, but her mysteries as well, as I’ve heard they’re wonderful, too.Thanks for including me in this event!

~The Lovely Librarian at Learning to Play the Bassoon

*Don’t forget to enter to win one of two fabulous Georgette Heyer Prize Packs from Sourcebooks. Also each “meaningful” comment on any Georgette Heyer post (including this one) in the month of August at Stiletto Storytime will also get you additional entries.*

Review: Bath Tangle by Georgette Heyer (1955)

    Lady Serena is in quite the predicament. Upon the unexpected death of her father the Earl of Spenborough she has learned that her inheritance down to every bit of her pin money is be governed by a trustee. Said trustee must also approve of any marriage Serena were to make or else she might lose any fortune left to her altogether other than a small sum from her deceased mother.

At the age of 25 it is not surprising the beautiful and strong-willed  Serena should have someone chosen to provide for her and watch over her but the choice of the individual is rather rare. You see her father the Earl chose none other than a man that Serena was once engaged to, a man she walked away from shortly before their wedding was to take place: the Marquis of Rotherham. A duo to behold, the Marquis and Serena often butt heads and their tempers are only matched by their ability to infuriate one another on a regular basis.

From the very first few pages of Bath Tangle readers are provided with a feisty heroine and a hero to match but soon things begin to get shall we say…tangled. After having to abandon their home Serena and her step-mother, a quiet young woman by the name of Fanny quietly remove to a small property on the estate of Milverley. However this proves to be unsuitable so they remove to Bath for a short amount of time hoping for a diversion from their grief and the every day reminder of their once happy life at Milverley. An beautiful vast estate which now belongs to another by the demands of the inheritance since Lord Spenborough left no heir.

Upon arriving in Bath, Lady Serena soon meets an acquaintance she never thought to find again. A man she once loved dearly but was prevented from being with due to his status and their youth. Major Hector Kirkby loves Serena now as ardently as he did seven years ago when they were kept apart. At this time his situation has changed somewhat as he has inherited an estate and done rather well in the military, he soon asks for Serena’s hand and receives her ardent assent. Only one obstacle seems to remain-the approval of Rotherham. Will Rotherham ever agree for Serena to marry this man she once loved? And is the rather reserved Hector Kirkby really the man for a woman like the “fast” Lady Serena?

Georgette Heyer once again leads us on an ride of humor, gossip and love in her much loved Bath Tangle. Full of colorful characters and the always entertaining sub-plots she is famous for, readers will find themselves swept up into Heyer’s Regency world and the exploits of her wild heroine Lady Serena and the devilish Rotherham with the fashionable backdrop of the picturesque Bath.

*Don’t forget to enter to win one of two fabulous Georgette Heyer Prize Packs from Sourcebooks. Also each “meaningful” comment on any Georgette Heyer post (including this one) in the month of August at Stiletto Storytime will also get you additional entries.*

Guest Post: Georgette Heyer’s Historical Romances…Like Olives

In my third year of University I complained to Cathy that I had nothing to read. Actually I’d shouted “I’m bored” from my dorm room loud enough for Cathy to hear (she lived two rooms away). I was lying on the floor with my feet on my bed staring at my bookshelf crammed with Political Science and History texts, and a collection of tattered recreational reading material by Austen, Caldwell, Plaidy and Seton wanting something new to read that wasn’t vaguely related to study. I was about to reread Persuasion (for the gazillionth time) when Cathy appeared in the doorway with a book and a smug smile. “Read this. You’ll love her.” Cathy loved Jane Austen as much as me, so there was no argument. That she said I would love her the author rather than the book also heightened my interest. The book was The Toll-Gate by Georgette Heyer.

Frankly, I didn’t take to The Toll-Gate. Mind you, this was after reading only two chapters. I complained to Cathy that the prose was plodding, the paragraphs too long and involved. Every speech seemed to end with an exclamation mark. I really didn’t care for the characters. Did she have anything else for me to read?

Cathy in her wisdom told me to keep reading and stop complaining. Heyer was like an olive – an acquired taste. Something children just didn’t get because their taste buds were not sophisticated, but grown ups got it because they were prepared to put in a deliberate effort to get to know the complexity of an olive. By getting to know an olive, only then could one appreciate the subtleties of taste, texture and uniqueness.

I loved olives, so I read on. By the end of the book I grudgingly admitted that Heyer was not too bad. Just like trying my first real olive. The taste was definitely different and rather adult but I still didn’t get what all the fuss was about. Cathy said it was just the same with olives. Many people just don’t get what all the fuss is about with Manzanillo or Kalamata olives.

I returned the book but kept my opinion of The Toll-Gate to myself, determined to be an adult, and not be childish and spit out the olive and never try one again. I humbly asked if I could borrow another Heyer. Cathy looked to have every Pan Heyer (the rather dreadful early 1970s covers) ever printed and from the shelf I chose Faro’s Daughter, and the rest is history. I LOVED Faro’s Daughter. Next, The Grand Sophy, These Old Shades, Devil’s Cub, The Black Moth, The Masqueraders, Bath Tangle… etc. etc. Cathy got tired of my comings and goings. She was my lending library. But I was hooked!

I’m sure there are many who still wonder what all the fuss is about with Heyer, but experience Heyer for yourself, put in the time and effort to acquire a taste for her books, and then you too will truly appreciate the wonderful world she has created. Bet you can’t read just one!

~Author Lucinda Brant

Lucinda Brant writes Georgian historical romances and crimances (crime with lashings of romance). NOBLE SATYR (Book One of the Roxton series) won the Random House/Woman’s Day Romantic Fiction Prize and pays homage to Heyer’s These Old Shades. Book 3 of the Roxton series – AUTUMN DUCHESS – is due out mid August.*

Guest Post: Differences of Georgette Heyer & Jane Austen

Perhaps one of the greatest literary celebrity death matches has been between Jane Austen and Georgette Heyer. Heyer and Austen are compared to each other, rather fairly or unfairly; but what sets them apart and makes them unique?

Jane Austen published her first novel, Sense and Sensibility, in 1811. This was followed by Pride and Prejudice (1813), Mansfield Park (1814) and Emma (1816). Persuasion and Northanger Abbey were published posthumously.

In contrast, Georgette Heyer published her first book, The Black Moth, in 1921 and her last book My Lord John in 1975. Heyer wrote a total of 50 novels, twelve of which are detective novels written towards the end of her career.

The main thing that sets them apart is that Austen wrote about the times in which she lived. She was familiar with her subjects because she was able to observe those around her daily. She was familiar with the customs and courtesies of society. This allowed her to exhibit her veiled wit which is imbedded in her carefully crafted pose.

“A heroine in a hack post-chaise is such a blow upon sentiment as no attempt at grandeur or pathos can withstand. Swiftly, therefore, shall her post-boy drive through the village, amid the gaze of Sunday groups, and speedy shall be her descent from it.”

(Northanger Abbey, Chapter 29)

Heyer, known primarily for her Regency novels, spent meticulous hours researching to ensure her novels accuracy. As she didn’t live in the times in which she wrote she sought to ensure that her novels painted a historical picture. She also took great pains with language, writing her works in a formal tone with period correct dialogue, although she was known to make up some things of her own as well.

“He was dressed in the height of the Versailles fashion, with full-skirted coat of palest lilac laced with silver, small-clothes andstockings of white, and waistcoat of flowered satin. On his feet he wore shoes with high red heels and silver buckles, while a wig of the latest mode, marvelously powdered and curled and smacking greatly of Paris, adorned a shapely head.”

(The Black Moth, Chapter 1)

I would argue, however, that Heyer wrote purely for entertainment which makes reading her slightly easier then Austen. Her plots are romantically driven with a singular focus of bringing together the hero and heroine. While there are conflicts and villains they sometimes feel like afterthoughts. Yet, even when they feel like afterthoughts they are still memorable.

‘Lord Lethbridge shut the door and stood for a moment in frowning silence. He was aroused from his abstraction by the approach of his valet, who came up the stairs from the basement to attend to him and remarked with concern that the rain had wetted his lordship’s coat.”

(The Convenient Marriage, Chapter 7)

Heyer’s characters also lack the depth which Austen typically exhibits. Although, I would argue Fanny Price of Mansfield Park is one of Austen’s least developed heroines, but I digress. She lacks the ability of Austen to take a satirical look at society and human nature itself. Austen was intricate and sly in her ability to reveal the flaws of human nature.

“Emma Woodhouse, handsome, clever, and rich, with a comfortable home and happy disposition seemed to unite some of the best blessings of existence; and live nearly twenty-one years in the world with very little to distress or vex her.”

(Emma, Chapter 1)

While Heyer and Austen are often compared to one another, I think it is considerate of us to remember that both these woman wrote in different times and in their own right they created their own poignant mark on the literary world. Austen delights us because of her ability to remark on society and human nature. Heyer delights us because she entertains us. She gave us some of the most memorable characters and plots.

One cannot go wrong with either, for they are both perfect and unique in their own way.

Guest Post by Kaydee at For the Love of Austen

Review: Cotillion by Georgette Heyer (1953)

      It’s an issue of money and marriage…alas the stuff regency love is made of. However there is a twist. The orphaned Miss Kitty Charing stands to become a very rich girl, an heiress if she wishes to be so but only if she obeys the odd request of her miser guardian Uncle Matthew. The catch is that she must marry one of her guardian’s nephews of which there are quite a few. Not a problem when Kitty has  always cared deeply for one of the nephews: Jack.  However when the suitors are summoned and told of the situation…Jack never arrives or offers his hand. Therefore if Kitty is to escape her life at Arnside and be provided for, she must marry another. If she does not, she will be left penniless when her guardian dies with no where to go.

Freddy Standen is an amiable if somewhat absent-minded man. Among all the other possible suitors the dandy Freddy is the one considered least likely to propose to marry Kitty. While many of the suitors need the money Kitty will inherit, Freddy is well provided for and much more concerned with his wardrobe than the attentions of a young lady. This is why Kitty immediately decides Freddy will be the perfect man to help her escape to London and find a way out of her situation through a pretend engagement.

The pretend engagement soon finds both Kitty and Freddy navigating the waters of a sparkling London and all it’s diversions. Throw in a few mixed up love connections with the re-apperance of the man Kitty loves and a drop of scandal and you have a novel that will keep you deep within it’s pages long into the night. Georgette Heyer takes a classic mixed up love scenario and makes it so much more in Cotillion. Adding layer upon layer of intrigue, humor and love story, Heyer manages to create a novel of depth and light-heartedness at the same time while providing sub-plot after sub-plot that will intrigue readers from the very first page.

Who will Kitty marry? Will true love prevail or is there a love lurking nearby of which she never suspected? A detailed cast of characters and a perfectly timed plot all reveal Kitty’s fate. A must read Heyer!

  (A Favor by Edmund Blair Leighton)

What’s in a cover?

 Ever wonder where the cover art of the Georgette Heyer novels published by Sourcebooks comes from? Novembers Autumn shows us a few examples of works of art transposed onto book covers here.

*Don’t forget to enter to win one of two fabulous Georgette Heyer Prize Packs from Sourcebooks. Also each “meaningful” comment on any Georgette Heyer post (including this one) in the month of August at Stiletto Storytime will also get you additional entries.*

Guest Review: Devil’s Cub by Georgette Heyer (1932)

What it’s about: This is the second book in the Alastair trilogy, but it’s absolutely no problem to read on its own or to read them out of sync.  It’s the late 18th Century, and twenty-four year old Dominic Alastair, Marquis of Vidal, is a spoiled, rich young man, who spends his time gambling and seducing women of a lower class than himself.  After he kills someone in a duel, he’s forced to leave the country, England, for France. He wants to take his current favorite with him, Sophia Challoner. Sophia knows she’s not in his league, but hopes that a compromising situation will force Dominic to marry her, so she’s all for eloping with him to France.  Mary Challoner, Sophia’s older and much wiser sister, thinks he will not. He will use her and abandon her. So, to teach him a lesson, she takes her sister’s place and not before they are far from home does Dominic discover who she is. Now she is in a compromising situation!  He kidnaps her to Paris and promises to marry her to protect her virtue, but Mary won’t have any of it. Although she does like him, that rogue! My thoughts: I loved this very entertaining story about the prim and proper (but certainly not scared of anything) Mary and the devilish Marquis of Vidal who never thought about anyone but himself, until he met and kidnapped Mary.  The book is full of horse-and-coach chases, mothers with certain ambitions for their sons and daughters (think marriage, think Pride and Prejudice), powdered wigs and perfume.  I loved the way the characters talk to each other, in a sort-of formal and old-fashioned way. I saw the ending coming from a long way ahead but that didn’t matter at all, it was great fun to see that it all ended as I had expected (and hoped).  5 stars (out of 5)!

*Don’t forget to enter to win one of two fabulous Georgette Heyer Prize Packs from Sourcebooks. Also each “meaningful” comment on any Georgette Heyer post (including this one) in the month of August at Stiletto Storytime will also get you additional entries.*

Guest Review: The Convenient Marriage by Georgette Heyer (1934)

I have to admit this book was my first introduction the Georgette Heyer and after I finished it, I was hooked on all things Heyer.

Horatia Winwood offers to marry the Earl of Rule in place of her sister, as her sister is in love with someone else. After she marries, she takes on her family pastime of gambling, which she isn’t very good at. Horatia’s antics provide a lot of comedy, but it also allows us to see what is so charming to the hero.

The Earl of Rule is a hero you want to slap over the head sometimes and then other times you want to kiss him. Mostly he’s infuriating. His actions, or better yet his reactions, are very calm and calculated. Just when you think he doesn’t care he surprises you. He’s also completely enamored with Horatia who has no idea.

Let us not forget Sir Robert, the nemesis of our beloved, yet infuriating Earl of Rule.  Sir Robert in an effort to get back at the Earl tries to ruin Horatia’s reputation. The Earl is not having any of it. He has a plan and what a glorious one it is. Throw in an appearance of Horatia’s harebrained brother and you have a great romantic comedy.

There is magic in The Convenient Marriage, and not because this was my first Heyer novel, but because the heroine in flawed. She is not perfect. She has faults. Horatia stutters. I remember that other readers hated that the heroine stuttered, but frankly I loved it. Why can’t a stuttering heroine find love? It was a part of her character and is part of the charm of the novel.

In addition, there is one of the classic Heyer formulas in the novel, the older man with the younger woman which seems to be a favorite of hers. While the difference in age between the hero and the heroine can sometimes be apparent, I found that most of the time I didn’t even notice. I was caught up in the comedy that Heyer is so proficient at.

Heyer is at her best in this novel. The comedy, the wit and the plot are what make this book so enjoyable. In fact the very end of the novel is one of my favorites. You cannot go wrong with this book. I think I’m going to go read this again.

~Kaydee at For the Love of Austen

*Don’t forget to enter to win one of two fabulous Georgette Heyer Prize Packs from Sourcebooks. Also each “meaningful” comment on any Georgette Heyer post (including this one) in the month of August at Stiletto Storytime will also get you additional entries.*

Georgette Heyer: A Class of Her Own

Georgette Heyer: A Class of Her Own

I was around fourteen years old when I read my first Georgette Heyer – Pistols for Two. And from then began my fascination with Heyer and her Regency Romances (I don’t care much for her historical and detective fiction). After I had devoured whatever I could come across that was written by her, I turned to other writers of Regency England hoping to re-discover the magic of Heyer. Unfortunately, till date, I have never come across a single romance writer about this period who comes even close to writing something akin to a Heyer romance. I assure you, I do not exaggerate. There are none that can hold a match to Georgette Heyer, leave alone a candle!

So then, what makes me claim that Heyer is in a class of her own? What is it that is so special about her that other writers of the genre cannot even compete with? What is the essence of Heyer’s Regency/early Georgian novels? Conversely, what brings Georgette Heyer up short from being considered a literary writer? What makes her works different from that of, say, Jane Austen?

Detail is the key

Georgette Heyer is said to have been a very meticulous researcher. She apparently owned a thousand books relating to her research alone!** She familiarised herself so completely with the times she wrote about that it seemed to be a part of her. All of this is so obvious in the details that she gives of the places, inns, clubs, people, dress and etiquette of that era. And though most of her novels deal with the aristocracy of the early Georgian and Regency Period, she knew quite a bit about the other side of society as is very plainly seen in Arabella with the instance of the chimneysweep boy, and more subtly, in the escapades of Hero in Friday’s Child. Her knowledge of Paris, the leading city in fashion and etiquette in those days, again shows itself in the likes of Powder and Patch and These Old Shades.

I also appreciate the authenticity of her characters. It manifests itself, not just in their dress and manner, but also in their language. Again, with language, it is not just dialects, but kinds of words and phrases used in various classes of society and even between men and women of these various classes of society. One of Heyer’s rather memorable (in my opinion) cant-speaking characters is young Sherry’s tiger in Friday’s Child.

While it becomes apparent to us the amount of research Heyer must have done to make her novels so very credible, we must understand that there was much she did not put into her novels. She never just drew from her own experiences. She weeded a great many things out. It is said that she had been to Scotland for awhile and had loved it.** Yet none of her characters even hail from Scotland, leave alone a novel based in that country. It would seem that this was because Heyer shuddered at the amount of research needed to study the Scottish dialect alone! Shows us how authentic her works really are, doesn’t it?

Variety in plot

In terms of plot, I have always found Heyer to be delightfully original. She is not repetitive which makes each novel even more charming and unique. However, in spite of the variety in plot, some of Heyer’s novels do share certain of the following themes:

• an older man helping a very young woman escape her old and undesirable life as in These Old Shades and The Corinthian

• a mystery that dominates the story with the romance playing a secondary role as in The Unknown Ajax, The Talisman Ring and The Quiet Gentleman

• a marriage in which the hero and heroine learn to love and respect each other as in Friday’s Child and April Lady

• the guardian who falls for his female ward as in Regency Buck and Frederica

• a matter of mistaken identity or identity theft as in The Masqueraders, False Colours and Arabella

• an older woman chaperoning a much younger one as in Lady of Quality and Black Sheep

Then there are novels that stand completely apart from the others such as Venetia where a rake falls in love with a sheltered woman in the country (here, the uniqueness of the story really lies in the personalities of the hero and heroine and the manner in which their love develops). Then there is the rather dark and gothic atmosphere in Cousin Kate, and the marriage that ends, not on a note of passionate love, but in a love that grows from familiarity and respect as in A Civil Contract.

The uniqueness of her characters and pairings

Even in Heyer’s characters one finds a melting pot. All her heroes and heroines vary in age, appearance and personality considerably. Among her heroines one is bound to find that some are young and extremely volatile and romantic or in their early to mid-twenties being sensible and charming or in their late twenties, full of dignity and poise. The heroes, on the other hand, are young and scatterbrained or hot-headed, a little older, sensible charming and trustworthy or jaded and cynical. Throw in all these possibilities and one gets a delightful mix of stories that give you several hours of relaxed and enjoyable pleasure. Surely it is not difficult to see how Heyer is such a favourite!

What stops Heyer short of being a literary figure herself?

Many Heyer fans, including me, have been quite indignant by the indifferent dismissal she receives. Surely her novels are not your ordinary, everyday, run-of-the-mill historical romances. However, Heyer lacks what it takes to make a work a literary piece. She lacks what Austen’s six major novels have in abundance. She lacks what the likes of Fanny Burney and Maria Edgeworth lacked so that their contemporary, Jane Austen, was the only one among them who would be remembered as part of the literary canon.

What did she lack?

She lacked thought provoking material, ideas, an insight into the human mind and soul. In other words, she lacked the essence of literariness. All her works are pure, unadulterated entertainment, so tastefully and skilfully done. But they do not have the depth and soul that the likes of Austen possess. They do not even deal with any sort of issue, and they lack any kind of commentary like there could have been, for example, in Arabella when the heroine rescues the chimneysweep boy. Heyer’s novels lack a voice and that is what makes her brilliant works non-literary.

So, if Heyer does not fall under the usual genre of historical romance, and she does not come in the league of the literary scene then where does she stand? Heyer simply stands on her own plane. She is a class and genre all her own.

She is Georgette Heyer.

**http://www.georgette-heyer.com/bio.html

An Acknowledgement: I would like to thank Courtney very much for this opportunity to voice my opinion on Heyer.

Guest Post by Risa at Bread Crumb Reads

Guest Review: Sylvester by Georgette Heyer (1957)

     After falling head over heels in love with Sir Waldo Hawkridge in The Nonesuch, I thought that no other male protagonist would come close to being as wonderful as he. But now I’ve decided that the Duke of Salford, also known as the titular Sylvester, comes a close second. He’s charming (though a bit conceited) and strong-willed and is entirely devoted to his mother. At the age of twenty-eight, he’s finally decided to take a wife and his mother and godmother think Phoebe Marlow might be just the girl for him. Unfortunately, he unknowingly snubbed young Phoebe at Almack’s last season and she subsequently cast him as the evil Count Ugolino in the novel she secretly wrote. And what’s worse, the character has more in common with the Duke than Phoebe ever knew and, once the novel is published, it will be impossible to hide the fact that she once thought him insufferable. What follows is part romance and part comedy as these two attempt to put aside all fictions and discover who the other one really is.

Though borrowing quite heavily from Pride and Prejudice (of which there are heaps of both), this was still a fun story. Phoebe is a bit manic for my tastes but she’s also very entertaining and I have to give her credit for standing her ground and contemplating having a career instead of just becoming a wife and mother. The plot of this story becomes a bit far-fetched by the end but it was easily forgivable.

My favorite character in the story (besides Sylvester, of course) has to be the outrageous Sir Nugent Fotherby, who is described in thefollowing tongue-in-cheek way –

“Other men might envy Sir Nugent; they could not despise him, for his pedigree was impeccable, his fortune exceeded sixty thousand pounds a year, and he had it on the authority of those boon-companions whom Lord Marlow rudely stigmatized as barnacles that, just as in all manners of fashion he was the finest Pink of the Ton, in the world of sport he figured as a Nonpareil, a regular Top-of-the-Trees, a Sure Card, up to all kinds of slums, never to be beaten on any suit.”

Sir Nugent is so ridiculous and is the perfect caricature of the Regency dandy. There are a few other stellar supporting characters in the story and I enjoyed almost every moment with them. This is one of the best Heyer romances I’ve read so far and would be a great choice for a reader new to her work as it’s not overly heavy on the period slang.

~Kristen M. at We Be Reading

*Don’t forget to enter to win one of two fabulous Georgette Heyer Prize Packs from Sourcebooks. Also each “meaningful” comment on any Georgette Heyer post (including this one) in the month of August at Stiletto Storytime will also get you additional entries.*